4 ms·
Since it’s an upgrade of markdown, you should have called it "markup".
by setopt 5mo ago
Since it’s an upgrade of markdown, you should have called it "markup".
- dtj1123 5mo agoThis sounds to me like it might benefit from some sort of "hypertext" functionality to allow for easy linking of documents
- solid_fuel 5mo agoNow you're cooking with gas. Maybe it could be some sort of semantic markup language so we can separate and annotate things like titles, headers, links, and all of that stuff.
- giwook 5mo agoThis is very interesting. I imagine the links of these documents to each other could be visualized as a web of some sort.
- marcus_holmes 5mo agoI would like to include some dynamic content in my documents. Could we include some kind of simple scripting language? Maybe call it something like that really popular, Java language? But of course, have it share no concepts with Java, because that would be too straightforward.
- tclancy 5mo agoPrice accordingly.
- mrspuratic 5mo ago"updoc" is still my favourite joke name. A long time ago (predating E lang's updoc afaict) I wrote a toy markup for semi-technical docs, named so with the specific intention of dropping it casually into conversation. Still funny :D