4 ms·

That "replacement" is not always full-on hardware. I have colleagues who are running AFP on BSD for continuous backups on their systems, and they have to recon

That "replacement" is not always full-on hardware. I have colleagues who are running AFP on BSD for continuous backups on their systems, and they have to reconfigure something new to be able to continue backing up their systems.

JumpCrisscross 6mo ago
> That "replacement" is not always full-on hardware Oh, I was thinking only of software. Apple dropping AFP in the OS doesn't mean it can't work at all.
- bayindirh 6mo ago
  I believe the only supported mode is SAMBA now.
trillic 6mo ago
I use this for networked Time Machine backups for multiple Macs in my household. Works just as well over tailscale VPN. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Netatalk https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Netatalk
- wang_li 6mo ago
  Also works for System 7 based Macintoshes. In case you got frozen in a glacier in 1991.
  - jshier 6mo ago
    Nah, classic Macintosh OSes aren't compatible with modern AFP.
    - wang_li 6mo ago
      They are compatible with netatalk though. The project split between version 2 and 3, but in recent releases they folded them back into a single thing. Current netatalk releases support all versions of AFP.
- snapetom 6mo ago
  One of my COVID projects was to set up a networked Time Machine backup on Raspberry Pi. Every single one of the blogspam sites (lifehacker, howtogeek, etc.) told you to use AFP/HFS+/Netatalk. I had so many problems with this. Time Machine would work well the first few times and then slow to a crawl. If there was a power outage, look out. The whole thing would be corrupted. It wasn't the network. FTP and scp worked just fine. Eventually I found one blog that told you how to do it with SMB and ext4. It was that site that I learned about the much malignment of AFP and HFS+. SMB/ext4 worked like a charm. Six years later and not a single hiccup.