3 ms·
that's lazy commentary. prove it. and prove why that matters in this specific context. If you're going to shit on someone's work, have a good reason.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
that's lazy commentary. prove it. and prove why that matters in this specific context. If you're going to shit on someone's work, have a good reason.
- macki0 6mo agoProof: https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus-mac/notepad-plus-plus-macos/commits/main/ https://github.com/notepad-plus-plus-mac/notepad-plus-plus-m... Every single commit says ‘and claude’
- demetris 6mo agoThat is not necessarily proof. Sometimes I am too lazy to think of a good commit message, so I have a custom command that tells the assistant to do this: Commit umstaged changes with a nice clean message summary and no full message. By default, Claude Code co-signs those commits (which I do not like at all as a default).
- 4nonverbal-alit 5mo agoThe proof is good enough though. Even if the code was written by author, not bothering to remove co-signed-by part from the commit message (assuming author did indeed wrote it by himself) let alone not writing their own commit message is an indication of negligence to me
- Griffinsauce 5mo agoProof no, but you can safely apply occams razor here.