3 ms·
The problem with that E-Ink is expensive, slow (you can't have moving cursors or any kind of video) and boring. The price will decrease once the technology
by jpd 18y ago
The problem with that E-Ink is expensive, slow (you can't
have moving cursors or any kind of video) and boring.
The price will decrease once the technology behind its production improves (and people stop there willingness to actually spend that much), it will also speed up over time (its just how things work. To address the last point: WTF?
Secondly, from the Pixel Qi site:
Our screens use 1/2 to 1/4 the power of a regular LCD
screen, and when integrated carefully with the device can
increase battery life between charges by 5-fold.
and from Giz:
Jepsen says it's even possible to get a week of battery
life from LCD tech, of course depending on the device the
screens are embedded in.
I really don't see how those two can statements can coexist. Currently we get around 8 hours from labtops, improve that by her 1/4 estimate and we now get 32 hours which fall short of our weeklong estimate.
Lastly:
Infrastructurally and perhaps historically speaking, the
odds are in LCD's favor.
I'm going to need this one spelled out for me...
- Retric 18y agoI think the important part was when integrated carefully with the device. Laptops spend energy on other things than just the LCD. However, reducing energy in other places has diminishing returns when the LCD is draining a lot of juice. Take the 17 inch mackbook's battery and use it to power a dell mini 9 with this type of LCD and you might get a weeks worth of use (7 * 8hours + standby) out of the thing.