5 ms·
I'm not the poster/site author, and we're saying the same thing. My claim is that since YouTube ultimately is responding to copyright complaints, SoundSlice is
by jdunck 14y ago
I'm not the poster/site author, and we're saying the same thing. My claim is that since YouTube ultimately is responding to copyright complaints, SoundSlice is no worse than a tab-sharing site with regard to infringement. I don't see how they can be liable.
- aggronn 14y agoI'm not following this thread; Are you suggesting that him sharing tabs isn't subject to copyright? Tabs sharing websites have to pay royalties, and have had to for several years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablature#Legal_issues http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablature#Legal_issues
- nollidge 14y agoYou're not saying the same thing at all. You're talking about Youtube performances, and rprasad is talking about tablature. Current tab-sharing sites are very much in a gray area at this point, and the SoundSlice founders have to deal with that somehow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablature#Legal_issues http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablature#Legal_issues > The MPA had been pushing for websites offering free tablatures to be shut down. MPA president Lauren Keiser said that their goal is for owners of free tablature services to face fines and even imprisonment.