3 ms·

The submitted article appears to be an LLM summary of https://www.sentinelone.com/labs/fast16-mystery-shadowbrokers-reference-reveals-high-precision-software-sa

by Retr0id 6mo ago

The submitted article appears to be an LLM summary of https://www.sentinelone.com/labs/fast16-mystery-shadowbrokers-reference-reveals-high-precision-software-sabotage-5-years-before-stuxnet/ https://www.sentinelone.com/labs/fast16-mystery-shadowbroker...

dd23 6mo ago
No clue if the link that I posted is an AI summary. I also just found it somewhere. But indeed many more details in the link you shared. Thanks for posting this!
bpt3 6mo ago
I think LLMs would do a better job. I was about to respond saying what a terrible article it was, as it reads as if the author has no idea what he was talking about. Attempting to paraphrase the original article would explain it.
dataflow 6mo ago
I don't see how it can be an LLM summary of that page given that it mentions many things that your link doesn't. Edit: Old link for those wondering, since it got changed: https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage/ https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage...
- Retr0id 6mo ago
  Such as?
  - dataflow 6mo ago
    Have you read both of them? There's a ton of stuff. "Advances in Civil Engineering", "TMSR-LF1", "Black Hat Asia"...
- andai 6mo ago
  It appears to be a summary of both the official SentinelOne article, and this one: https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malware/ https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malwa...
  - dataflow 6mo ago
    No, these aren't all mentioned there either: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47914748 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47914748
arcza 6mo ago
> This one did not destroy machines or blow things up. It corrupted the math. This LLM style of writing has had it's day.
dgacmu 6mo ago
Thank you for finding this - the original is a really interesting article. (@dang - consider re-pointing to this?)
- DetroitThrow 6mo ago
  Or to https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malware/ https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malwa... The current article is hard to read
andai 6mo ago
https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malware/ https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malwa... This one has some additional details, based on a talk given by one of the authors.
dang 6mo ago
Changed now from https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage/ https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage.... Thanks!

by Retr0id 6mo ago

dd23 6mo ago

No clue if the link that I posted is an AI summary. I also just found it somewhere. But indeed many more details in the link you shared. Thanks for posting this!

bpt3 6mo ago

I think LLMs would do a better job. I was about to respond saying what a terrible article it was, as it reads as if the author has no idea what he was talking about. Attempting to paraphrase the original article would explain it.

dataflow 6mo ago

I don't see how it can be an LLM summary of that page given that it mentions many things that your link doesn't. Edit: Old link for those wondering, since it got changed: https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage/ https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage...

Retr0id 6mo ago
Such as?
- dataflow 6mo ago
  Have you read both of them? There's a ton of stuff. "Advances in Civil Engineering", "TMSR-LF1", "Black Hat Asia"...
andai 6mo ago
It appears to be a summary of both the official SentinelOne article, and this one: https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malware/ https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malwa...
- dataflow 6mo ago
  No, these aren't all mentioned there either: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47914748 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47914748

arcza 6mo ago

> This one did not destroy machines or blow things up. It corrupted the math. This LLM style of writing has had it's day.

dgacmu 6mo ago

Thank you for finding this - the original is a really interesting article. (@dang - consider re-pointing to this?)

DetroitThrow 6mo ago
Or to https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malware/ https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malwa... The current article is hard to read

andai 6mo ago

https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malware/ https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/24/fast16_sabotage_malwa... This one has some additional details, based on a talk given by one of the authors.

dang 6mo ago

Changed now from https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage/ https://hackingpassion.com/fast16-pre-stuxnet-cyber-sabotage.... Thanks!