4 ms·
Depends. I reckon a proof by an amateur would either be worthless because it demonstrates no understanding whatsoever or significantly better because they actua
by shiandow 6mo ago
Depends. I reckon a proof by an amateur would either be worthless because it demonstrates no understanding whatsoever or significantly better because they actually understand the proof.
LLM produced texts are often in a weird area where the quality of the content and the quality of the writing have very little to do with one another.
- FartyMcFarter 6mo agoI don't think it's true that all amateurs have no understanding whatsoever. Amateurs have proven things before, and they've also wasted mathematicians time with wrong proofs.
- shiandow 6mo agoI'm not saying none of them have any understanding, I'm saying the ones who understand would write better proofs.