3 ms·
1) How do you know the clanker respects the instruction not to search the internet? 2) Jared Lichtman is indeed a mathematician at Stanford University but invo
by etaKl 6mo ago
1) How do you know the clanker respects the instruction not to search the internet?
2) Jared Lichtman is indeed a mathematician at Stanford University but involved in the AI startup math.inc, which seems more relevant here. Terence Tao is involved in a partership program with that startup.
3) Liam Price is a general AI booster on Twitter. A lot of AI boosting on Twitter is not organic and who knows what help he got. Nothing in this Twitter is organic.
4) Scientific American is owned by Springer Nature, which is an AI booster:
https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/ai https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/ai
- lima 6mo ago> How do you know the clanker respects the instruction not to search the internet? You can't, but given that it's a previously unsolved problem, it doesn't seem relevant? (nor are the author's potential biases - the claims are easily verified independently)
- lakkv 6mo agoThe fact that disclosures that would have been standard in 2000 are now downranked to limit their reach shows that AI discussion is indistinguishable from doubting the Archangel Moroni on an LDS forum. Maybe that isn't fair, probably the LDS people are more open minded that the pro-AI people.
- anthonyrstevens 6mo agoThe parent comment you refer to is part disclosure listing, part bad-faith conspiracy blatting