3 ms·
Honestly, I found these two attempts at universal theory more interesting: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12269 https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12269 https://www.mdpi.
by js8 6mo ago
Honestly, I found these two attempts at universal theory more interesting:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12269 https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12269
https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/28/3/332 https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/28/3/332
I am also interested in connection with fuzzy logic - it seems that NNs can reason in a fuzzy way, but what they are doing, formally? For years, people have been trying to formalize fuzzy reasoning but it looks like we don't care anymore.
I feel like NNs (and transformers) are the OOP (object-oriented programming) of ML. Really popular, works pretty well in practice, but nobody understands the fundamentals; there is a feeling it is a made up new language to express things expressible before, but hard to pinpoint where exactly it helps.
- Mithriil 6mo ago> nobody understands the fundamentals Funny statement to be found in the discussion about... research results on the fundamentals.