3 ms·
If the recipients could only afford a traditional mud + thatch home, the contractors building work was new additional demand, rather than competition against ex
by manarth 6mo ago
If the recipients could only afford a traditional mud + thatch home, the contractors building work was new additional demand, rather than competition against existing builders.
Even when first-world funding dries up, knowledge of the design, its features and benefits will remain. It's also cheaper than the alternative single-storey concrete home design, so perhaps generating new construction demand from people who couldn't quite afford the more expensive single-storey stone house but can afford this new design.
It's certainly an eye-opening unusual project, but I think it's a net gain for the region, even without a sustained/permanent first-world benefactor.
- graemep 6mo agoYou would almost certainly have got a bigger next gain for the same cost if you gave the same people the money used to build the house.
- mothballed 6mo ago7x GDP to an unbanked villager? It would be stolen / "shared" post haste.