3 ms·
Calling a custom Linux build a brand-new OS is like a car tuner claiming they built a new car. You didn't build the engine or the chassis; you just tuned it and
by nikolay 6mo ago
Calling a custom Linux build a brand-new OS is like a car tuner claiming they built a new car. You didn't build the engine or the chassis; you just tuned it and gave it a custom paint job. It's exactly like a hairdresser - they aren't creating a new human being, they're just cutting, coloring, and styling an existing one. It's a Linux distribution, i.e., a "distro," not a new OS!
- cassianoleal 6mo ago> tuned it and gave it a custom paint job The way to interact with the OS is significantly different from almost all other Linux distros. There is no shell, no DE. This feels like a lot more than "a custom paint job". Is Ubuntu an OS? Mint? Neither have built the package managment system, or the kernel, the DE(s), the utilities (maybe some but certainly not all). What about CentOS? Or Bazzite? Or even Android? Is macOS an OS, or "a custom BSD distro"? And if none of those are OSs, does a Linux-based OS even exist? If not, what's the point of the distinction?
- nikolay 6mo agoYours is a distro. Period. When you create your own kernel, then you can make bold claims like "I created an OS," when you haven't. Be humble, and you'll be more successful. Linus Torvalds and DHH are the only two arrogant people in tech, but both have accomplished enough to earn the exception. Hubris has no place in tech!
- cassianoleal 6mo agolol what? I have no distros or OSs. You're delusional and arrogant yourself. > Linus Torvalds and DHH are the only two arrogant people in tech Are you feeling ok bud?
- nikolay 6mo agoI'm very well, thank you for your sincere concern, but I can't say the same about you, unfortunately. Keep kidding yourself and use misnomers, but your command of English is poor. You can call it MisnomerOS, and that would be totally fine, but you can't claim "I've built an OS." You've built no OS.