3 ms·
What provider do you use for Kimi
by ramoz 6mo ago
What provider do you use for Kimi
- taytus 6mo agoStraight from them, but I know other providers like io.net can be faster but I like to directly support the project.
- subscribed 6mo agoThx. I'll try with my personal projects (because dues to the data collection and ToS most providers are forbidden in my company), if I can opt out of training on my input. I'm just getting a but tired of using Opus 2.6 which eats my whole allowance and then some £££ going through the 4kB prompt to review ~13 kB text file twice - and that's on top of the sometimes utter bonkers, bad, lazy answers I'm not getting even from the local Gemma 4 E4B.
- skippyboxedhero 6mo agoThe provider is a massive issue. People moving off Claude tend to assume this is solved. Claude's uptime is terrible. The uptime of most other providers is even worse...and you get all the quantization, don't know what model you are actually getting, etc.
- Leynos 6mo agoKimi 2.5 was like using Sonnet 4 on a flaky ADSL line. I haven't tried K2.6 yet, but the physical unreliability of the connection was too off-putting.
- bigethan 6mo agoOpenRouter and I'm toying around with Hermes. Seems good so far, but haven't really gotten into anything heavy yet. Though the "freedom" of not sweating the token pause and the costs not being too high is real.