2 ms·

Very few wouldn't, unless very much driven by their religion to fetish death. Who wouldn't select a part of the population they find unsaveable, say evil genoc

Very few wouldn't, unless very much driven by their religion to fetish death. Who wouldn't select a part of the population they find unsaveable, say evil genocidal billionaires, and sacrifice them for extending their own lifespan + improving how they believe the world should be? Win-win.

schnuri 6mo ago
I would not because it’s evil.
keybored 6mo ago
Standard fare to excuse powerful people who do actual harm with something about human nature. So who am I to judge? I have impurities in my heart because I dislike people who cause harm. Best wait for the saints to weigh in.
embedding-shape 6mo ago
> Very few wouldn't, unless very much driven by their religion to fetish death. I feel sad that you seemingly have met more people who lack compassion and empathy than ones who have it. Personally, I don't know (or "hang out" rather maybe) many people who'd sacrifice anyone's life just to live a day longer, and I don't think that's a useful default view to have of people, most people I've met don't want to hurt others. Most people will hurt others if they can avoid getting hurt themselves by doing so, but that doesn't mean those same people would sacrifice someone's life to get another day.
- haxiomic 6mo ago
  Though many would sacrifice an intelligent animals like a pig or dolphin and they’d do this optionally
  - bloppe 6mo ago
    In the West, most will happily slaughter a cow but never a dog (and by slaughter, I mean allow someone else to slaughter it for you, but never be OK with doing it yourself). In many Indian states, cow slaughter is a crime. Many places in China traditionally ate dog meat. People all over the world make more-or-less arbitrary decisions about which animals are OK to kill, and that's before even talking about their fellow humans. I'm not a nihilist and I do eat meat. I think we should minimize suffering to others. But I can see how anybody could be conditioned to think otherwise. It's not some inherent human instinct to want to preserve others' lives. We've had to develop that instinct culturally.
- yourfavbar 6mo ago
  [dead]
therobots927 6mo ago
The evil genocidal billionaires will be the ones killing to extend their lifespan. Not the other way around.
NoGravitas 6mo ago
Friend, I would shorten my life by a day to moderately improve the convenience of someone I barely know. I've spent enough time in this meat grinder.
otikik 6mo ago
Well that is a sad, sad, world view. I think very few people would. Precisely that lack of scruples is a prerequisite and a consequence of becoming rich and powerful.

schnuri 6mo ago

I would not because it’s evil.

keybored 6mo ago

Standard fare to excuse powerful people who do actual harm with something about human nature. So who am I to judge? I have impurities in my heart because I dislike people who cause harm. Best wait for the saints to weigh in.

embedding-shape 6mo ago

> Very few wouldn't, unless very much driven by their religion to fetish death. I feel sad that you seemingly have met more people who lack compassion and empathy than ones who have it. Personally, I don't know (or "hang out" rather maybe) many people who'd sacrifice anyone's life just to live a day longer, and I don't think that's a useful default view to have of people, most people I've met don't want to hurt others. Most people will hurt others if they can avoid getting hurt themselves by doing so, but that doesn't mean those same people would sacrifice someone's life to get another day.

haxiomic 6mo ago
Though many would sacrifice an intelligent animals like a pig or dolphin and they’d do this optionally
- bloppe 6mo ago
  In the West, most will happily slaughter a cow but never a dog (and by slaughter, I mean allow someone else to slaughter it for you, but never be OK with doing it yourself). In many Indian states, cow slaughter is a crime. Many places in China traditionally ate dog meat. People all over the world make more-or-less arbitrary decisions about which animals are OK to kill, and that's before even talking about their fellow humans. I'm not a nihilist and I do eat meat. I think we should minimize suffering to others. But I can see how anybody could be conditioned to think otherwise. It's not some inherent human instinct to want to preserve others' lives. We've had to develop that instinct culturally.
yourfavbar 6mo ago
[dead]

therobots927 6mo ago

The evil genocidal billionaires will be the ones killing to extend their lifespan. Not the other way around.

NoGravitas 6mo ago

Friend, I would shorten my life by a day to moderately improve the convenience of someone I barely know. I've spent enough time in this meat grinder.

otikik 6mo ago

Well that is a sad, sad, world view. I think very few people would. Precisely that lack of scruples is a prerequisite and a consequence of becoming rich and powerful.