3 ms·
> the person dusturbed the operation Did they? The article says it's unclear as to their intent. > Authorities did not specify if the man had intentionally se
by PUSH_AX 5mo ago
> the person dusturbed the operation
Did they? The article says it's unclear as to their intent.
> Authorities did not specify if the man had intentionally sent the photo to authorities during their search or simply shared it online.
- lukan 5mo agoIntent or not, it did disturb as it misslead. And .. how can one imagine not disturb a search, when posting a wrong location?
- stronglikedan 5mo agoIntent or not, disturbing the search or not, it's silly that the authorities would arrest a civilian because of their own incompetence.
- computerfriend 5mo agoCivilians get arrested for incompetence all the time.
- baranul 5mo agoThat's the true core of the story. Was the man truly trying to mislead authorities or is it more about authorities using the man as a scapegoat to hide their incompetence.
- lukan 5mo agoThey were searching for a wolf. (Not really a standard task) They don't have total surveillance, so also rely on public information - a citicien posts information about the location of the wolf, a picture! - authorities adopt their search based on that picture Where is the incompetence here?
- yongjik 5mo agoI swear, some commenters here think "the government is incompetent" is an axiom and work backward from there to fill in the details.
- amenhotep 5mo agoEveryone involved in this including the police are civilians