4 ms·

Cool website and service, but, is anyone else tired of businesses using this recent tragedy to advertise? Edit: Also pretty sure this is a little to late for v

Cool website and service, but, is anyone else tired of businesses using this recent tragedy to advertise? Edit: Also pretty sure this is a little to late for victims of hurricane sandy who lost thier computers.

deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
- jmathai 14y ago
  Yes, the intent was to not profit off the situation. It's why the free accounts are lifetime ones and not something that expires and then forces the user(s) to pay. If there's anything to be done to make that more clear we're happy to update the offer.
  - martswite 14y ago
    After going back and reading my original post I realise I didn't make clear my problem, at all, please accept my apologies. I guess what I was trying to say is: Though you aren't financially profiting. You still gain publicity through this promotion at a time when the product you are offering is likely to be the last thing on many people in the affected areas mind. IMO it's a little distasteful. I do however understand that it's done with the best intentions. I also agree with points made by others that maybe a different action might have come across more positive at a time like this (donations to a charity etc). I'm nowhere near the disaster area being in the U.K but are there charities directly involved in clearing up the mess and helping people out that you could have donated to?
    - jmathai 14y ago
      Apology granted :). This really isn't an issue of what should we be doing and is what we're doing enough. That's a larger question and applies every tragedy. As a business (and a startup) we aren't involved in any specific charitable organization. This one seemed to align with our goals as a company. And even more as an open source company who received funding from the Shuttleworth Foundation. Will be gain publicity? Probably. I hope so. But that doesn't mean we can't offer our services to people who might need it, even if it's not the most important thing on their mind right now. So yes, I agree with you philosophically. But pragmatically, not as much.

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

jmathai 14y ago
Yes, the intent was to not profit off the situation. It's why the free accounts are lifetime ones and not something that expires and then forces the user(s) to pay. If there's anything to be done to make that more clear we're happy to update the offer.
- martswite 14y ago
  After going back and reading my original post I realise I didn't make clear my problem, at all, please accept my apologies. I guess what I was trying to say is: Though you aren't financially profiting. You still gain publicity through this promotion at a time when the product you are offering is likely to be the last thing on many people in the affected areas mind. IMO it's a little distasteful. I do however understand that it's done with the best intentions. I also agree with points made by others that maybe a different action might have come across more positive at a time like this (donations to a charity etc). I'm nowhere near the disaster area being in the U.K but are there charities directly involved in clearing up the mess and helping people out that you could have donated to?
  - jmathai 14y ago
    Apology granted :). This really isn't an issue of what should we be doing and is what we're doing enough. That's a larger question and applies every tragedy. As a business (and a startup) we aren't involved in any specific charitable organization. This one seemed to align with our goals as a company. And even more as an open source company who received funding from the Shuttleworth Foundation. Will be gain publicity? Probably. I hope so. But that doesn't mean we can't offer our services to people who might need it, even if it's not the most important thing on their mind right now. So yes, I agree with you philosophically. But pragmatically, not as much.