3 ms·

It's not legal for him, but it is for them.

• nandomrumber 6mo ago
  That’s not it. It’s that there isn’t an Attorney General who would dare attempt raise a case against the hand that feeds them.
  • pjio 6mo ago
    In theory the separation of powers should prevent this.
    • pjc50 6mo ago
      What does separation of powers mean when both houses, the president, and the Supreme Court are controlled by the same party? At the moment the US is just Big Poland (PiS era).
      • pjio 6mo ago
        I meant the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Maybe this is more of a thing in Europe, even if not perfect here.
        • pjc50 6mo ago
          There's no separation of powers when they're all run by the same party, is my point.