3 ms·
It is more than good enough and has effectively caught up with Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 according to the benchmarks. It's about 2 months behind GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.
by rvz 7mo ago
It is more than good enough and has effectively caught up with Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 according to the benchmarks.
It's about 2 months behind GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7.
As long as it is cheap to run for the hosting providers and it is frontier level, it is a very competitive model and impressive against the others. I give it 2 years maximum for consumer hardware to run models that are 500B - 800B quantized on their machines.
It should be obvious now why Anthropic really doesn't want you to run local models on your machine.
- colordrops 7mo agoWhat's going to change in 2 years that would allow users to run 500B-800B parameter models on consumer hardware?
- DiscourseFan 7mo agoI think its just an estimate
- indigodaddy 7mo agoBut the question remains
- snovv_crash 7mo agoWith the ability of the Qwen3.6 27B, I think in 2 years consumers will be running models of this capability on current hardware.
- deaux 7mo agoVibes > Benchmarks. And it's all so task-specific. Gemini 3 has scored very well in benchmarks for very long but is poor at agentic usecases. A lot of people prefering Opus 4.6 to 4.7 for coding despite benchmarks, much more than I've seen before (4.5->4.6, 4->4.5). Doesn't mean Deepseek v4 isn't great, just benchmarks alone aren't enough to tell.