3 ms·
It would be better because it would create a more diverse work space where multiple employers complete for employees, instead of one company playing musical cha
by autaut 5mo ago
It would be better because it would create a more diverse work space where multiple employers complete for employees, instead of one company playing musical chairs with people
- singpolyma3 5mo agoHaving fewer jobs available would result in more employers? I'm not sure how.
- autaut 5mo agoA few companies get almost all investments. They start a lot of projects fast and close the ones that don’t work If companies stuck to fewer projects, money would be invested in other companies focusing on specific products, you get a lot of companies and not the market concentration you got today (which is responsible according to few economists to a lot of the us labor market dysfunctions it is currently experiencing)