3 ms·
Please look more closely. This is "for developers creating mobile applications, rather than web applications". And I don't see any "triumphant tone", but rather
by calibraxis 14y ago
Please look more closely. This is "for developers creating mobile applications, rather than web applications". And I don't see any "triumphant tone", but rather just a nice announcement.
I pick Clojure more often for my uses (not that I'm as liberated as I'd like in choosing tools), but I can imagine situations where I'd instead use Common Lisp.
- codewright 14y agoPlease look more closely. This is about the fact that their post about their mobile product took it for granted that web applications was some kind of conquered country for Common Lisp community when it's far from that. Also, their post had that triumphant tone + the Paul Graham name-dropping I referred to.
- calibraxis 14y agoAny discussion of Common Lisp tends towards a classic comp.lang.lisp style flamewar. Strawman exaggerations, complaints about the state of Common Lisp libraries, arguments about someone's "tone"...