3 ms·
Re pt 3, says here he entirely declined to put on a defense during that part. https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/plaintiffs-attorneys-plan-to-rest-their-
by pie_flavor 6mo ago
Re pt 3, says here he entirely declined to put on a defense during that part. https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/plaintiffs-attorneys-plan-to-rest-their-case-in-sandy-hook-defamation-trial/2886010/ https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/plaintiffs-attorne...
- cogman10 6mo agoI guess I find that a bit misleading. His lawyers in CT didn't call witnesses but they did cross examine the plaintiffs witnesses. In the TX case they did have AJ take the stand for his own defense, the "Perry Mason" moment was during the cross examination which I'm sure he didn't want to repeat in CT. That said, his CT lawyer was REALLY bad, far worse than his TX lawyer who famously gave away a copy of his phone by mistake.