3 ms·
It’s an informational and photography site. If the images were faked, it would be a lie. AI generated images are not appropriate for source or reference materi
by Aurornis 7mo ago
It’s an informational and photography site. If the images were faked, it would be a lie.
AI generated images are not appropriate for source or reference material.
- tejohnso 7mo agoIt's not the Encyclopædia Britannica. I could see if this site was expected to be source or reference material as you suggest. Maybe I'm missing something and it's supposed to be authoritative. But I don't see why someone would be full of worry that a random web site on the internet is posting information that may or may not be accurate. Happens all the time. Thanks for the explanation. I honestly wasn't sure what could be causing "plenty of worries" in this context. At least now I know what the issue might be.
- two_handfuls 7mo agoThe encyclopedia is not the only one. Anyone who says something is a photo would be lying if it was AI-generated instead. Knowingly posting lies is not ok.