4 ms·
care to expand? who was doing the occupation? what were the "tactics". please provide reputable (meaning not random websites, government websites are okay as lo
by yozmsn 14y ago
care to expand? who was doing the occupation? what were the "tactics".
please provide reputable (meaning not random websites, government websites are okay as long as they're not from involved parties, ie Hamas' website is not considered reputable) sources while you're at it.
- pretoriusB 14y agoHow are these for reputable sources? The United Nations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resoluti... Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories US State Dept: http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18278.htm http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18278.htm Israeli soldiers: http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/ http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/
- yozmsn 14y ago1. wikipedia =/= reputable 2. Look at the contents of all those "resolutions" and you come to realize that none of them stand or are unbiased. 2a. A lot of those Resolutions are contradictory and self referential. anything else?
- pretoriusB 14y ago>1. wikipedia =/= reputable 2. Look at the contents of all those "resolutions" and you come to realize that none of them stand or are unbiased. 2a. A lot of those Resolutions are contradictory and self referential. anything else? Yes, the UN is "biased" and "does not stand", Wikipedia is not "reputable". Conveniently sidestepping the US State Dept and Israeli soldiers accounts too. May I suggest that it's not the UN who is "biased" but you?