4 ms·
The author of the first book listed there explains there was no ancient Silk Road. This concept was dreamt up in 1877. https://youtube.com/shorts/Ki4UQ20tWQk h
by qart 5mo ago
The author of the first book listed there explains there was no ancient Silk Road. This concept was dreamt up in 1877.
https://youtube.com/shorts/Ki4UQ20tWQk https://youtube.com/shorts/Ki4UQ20tWQk
- bwb 5mo agoya, there were a bunch of trade routes along this path to all the different regions/cities. We just named the entire concept the "Silk Road" in the 1800s (it was coined in 1877 by Ferdinand von Richthofen).
- ripe 5mo agoYes. Moreover: "While engaged in a survey of China, the baron was charged with dreaming up a route for a railway linking Berlin to Beijing. This he named die Seidenstrassen, the Silk Roads. It was not until 1938 that the term Silk Road appeared in English, as the title of a popular book by a Nazi-sympathising Swedish explorer, Sven Hedin." -- historian William Dalrymple https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2024/oct/06/the-silk-road-still-casts-a-spell-but-was-the-ancient-trading-route-just-a-western-invention https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2024/oct/06/the-sil...
- usrnm 5mo agoJust like there was no Bronze age, Middle Ages or Third World. It doesn't mean that we cannot use the terminology or that it's necessarily wrong, it's just limited and we need to understand the limits
- PokemonNoGo 5mo ago>Third world Non-aligned countries didn't exist? Sorry I need some coffee and I'm feeling a little thick at the moment.
- oersted 5mo agoIs that the meaning of “Third World”? As in East/West/Other? I always thought it was more about Developed/Developing/Undeveloped, mostly in terms of the industrial transition. But, if we are being honest, it’s used a lot more as “third class”. I suppose indeed that it is not really a well defined “thing”, like the Silk Road.
- mandevil 5mo agoWhen originally coined (circa 1950 around the Korean War), the First World was the US aligned block of countries, the Second World was the USSR aligned block of countries, and the Third World was all of the countries not part of either. Egypt, India, Yugoslavia, Ghana and Indonesia viewed themselves as leaders of the broader political movement during the 1960's and 1970's. Even into the 1960's there were few industrialized nations outside of those two main blocks, so "Third World" quickly lost its explicitly political meaning and became more a description of the level of capital investment and worker productivity.
- usrnm 5mo agoThey did exist the same way people and goods did travel across Eurasia, but it wasn't some defined political or economical entity and they did not call themselves "the third world"
- lamasery 5mo agoUnlike "the Silk Road" or "the Middle Ages", "third world" was a term in contemporary use at the time it applies to, including among non-aligned states and NGOs that worked on third world cooperation. It was pretty well-defined as political classifications go, and people involved in actual "entities" related to it were aware of and sometimes used the term.
- BurningFrog 5mo agoThis just says that no one was aware the Silk Road existed, much less had named it that. But it did exist, and goods were shipped between Europe and China without either side being aware the other existed, which at least I think is pretty darn amazing!