4 ms·
> Sigh, why not just use named functions? I.e. a Lisp?
by jampekka 6mo ago
> Sigh, why not just use named functions?
I.e. a Lisp?
- childintime 6mo ago> Inspired by: CoffeeScript, Lisp, Ruby | Powered by: Bun
- jampekka 6mo agoI meant that most Lisps are named functions/macros only (with some named special forms), and you are calling for that kind of syntax?