Did you do a net benefit calculation? If not, all these knee jerk anti-AI comments are tiresome and predictable (see luddites). > I’ll ask you engage with the

Did you do a net benefit calculation? If not, all these knee jerk anti-AI comments are tiresome and predictable (see luddites). > I’ll ask you engage with the argument honestly instead of simply parroting what you already believe absent reading I did engage with argument. The argument is a tiresome old argument that is knee-jerk anti tech. You seem to be the thoughtless one in this discourse repeating for the infinite time an anti-tech position assuming net negatives outweigh massively net +ves. Also, why attack me instead of the argument? Did I touch a logical sore point? I believe so. > For the nth time: scale, easiness, and access, matter. By that logic, So the printing press was evil? Remember, Mao/Stalin/Hitler used presses to spread their propaganda. Also, for the n+1 time, using your own style, don't be lazy: 1. Come up with a net benefit calculation for AI. What? You can't? Then, don't try to claim this is all net negative. 2. Explain how AI is different from other tech like the printing press, that also had scale, easiness, and access.