3 ms·
I found on coding tasks that Qwen 3.5 can actually do the thing whereas Gemma 4 went off the rails frequently. Will try this new 3.6 release today.
by chr15m 6mo ago
I found on coding tasks that Qwen 3.5 can actually do the thing whereas Gemma 4 went off the rails frequently. Will try this new 3.6 release today.
- verdverm 6mo agoThere was a qwen-3.6 MoE six days ago that I thought was better than Gemma 4. Today's is a dense model. (gemma release both a 26B MoE and a 31B dense at the same time) I have intention to evaluate all four on some evals I have, as long as I don't get squirrelled again.
- da-x 6mo agoI use Qwen 3.5 122B on an RTX PRO 6000 with open code, and very pleased. I don't feel a need for using a closed model any more. The result after answering questions in Plan mode is almost always what I want, with very few occasional bugs. It does a lot of effort to see how the code I am working on is written now while extending it in the same style. If they release a Qwen 3.6 that also makes good use of the card, may move to it.