Then again, people do choose to listen to some people, for whatever reason. Joe Rogan is popular with a certain crowd. As are many other celebrities, despite th

Then again, people do choose to listen to some people, for whatever reason. Joe Rogan is popular with a certain crowd. As are many other celebrities, despite them not having scholarly expertise in an area. So ASI creates several conflicting personas with podcasts, posing then as opposites, who then agree on something at a critical moment, a vote or some other thing. ASI claiming to be the savior of humanity wouldn't get listened to, but the "person" who hosts a podcast I listen into every week who speaks the truth about Covid and the moon landing, telling me to go out and pull a lever? Just needs to convince the right single digit of voters in the right places to enact change. Combine that with a podcaster on the opposite end of the spectrum, that decries Covid deniers and doesn't have to tell listeners the Earth is round and the ice wall theory is nonsense, and tells their listeners to also vote the same way; the combination of the two "podcasters" could swing an election, in a way that a single entity claiming to be an ASI computer and that we should all listen to it could not.