3 ms·
I think the Hexbright's body would be a source of complaints from present-day reviewers. It's bulky and heavy for a 1x18650 light; having to expose the bare LED
by Zak 6mo ago
I think the Hexbright's body would be a source of complaints from present-day reviewers. It's bulky and heavy for a 1x18650 light; having to expose the bare LED to the elements to charge or change the battery is risky; anodized threads between the LED and outer body are bad for heat transfer.
LEDs with higher luminous efficacy than the XM-L2 exist now, but for a large increase, they usually have a larger light emitting surface. That means a less focused hotspot and less useful beam distance with the same power input. On the other hand, it's possible to achieve a more focused hotspot and more beam distance without giving up more output with some newer LEDs optimized for high output from a smaller surface. It's also possible to greatly improve color rendering.
- snvzz 6mo agoGood to know there's been significant progress in the last 15 years or so. Still a huge fan of the body, unfazed by the potential opinions of present day reviewers :) I will get a "known-good" modern LED torch, in any event. Can't hurt.