2 ms·
Would your ideal world apply to humans as well? Like if I see some art in a museum and it inspires me to create some of my own, I would need to pay a licensing
by brookst 6mo ago
Would your ideal world apply to humans as well? Like if I see some art in a museum and it inspires me to create some of my own, I would need to pay a licensing fee to the original artist?
And what about the artists that inspired them? There is no art in the world that sprang fully formed from one single person, without any influences.
Should we reshape our economy to ensure knowledge and artistic provenance is maintained perpetually?
This whole discussion is so weird to me. It’s like AI has freaked everyone out so much that the instinct is to run to the safety of Disney-esque complete control and perpetual monetization of every work.
Which is exactly the opposite of how art worked for the first several hundred thousand years. Really, we want to double down on the perverse incentives and tight control that IP owners have given us in the past 50 years?
- Jtarii 6mo ago>Like if I see some art in a museum and it inspires me to create some of my own, I would need to pay a licensing fee to the original artist? Nope, humans are admitted for free :). >And what about the artists that inspired them? There is no art in the world that sprang fully formed from one single person, without any influences. As long as you are a human you get to be inspired all you want :) You seem very invested in licking the boot of the trillion dollar corporations. Your fellow humans are concerned. >Really, we want to double down on the perverse incentives and tight control that IP owners have given us in the past 50 years? Isn't it interesting that the EXACT second that copyright law impedes billion dollar corporations it is thrown out the window, really makes you think huh?
- brookst 6mo ago[dead]