3 ms·
it is. itll still not create AGI without some breakthrough in instruction vs data separation of concerns
by cyanydeez 7mo ago
it is. itll still not create AGI without some breakthrough in instruction vs data separation of concerns
- lugu 7mo agoYou can park a lot there. No offence but I love how AGI doesn't mean anything. It used to be that AI was a goal post. Now it is AGI. We could use characters from sci-fi culture to describe milestones. In order to achieve robocop level, we must solve the instruction vs data problem.
- lokar 7mo agoThus it always was. I’m old enough to remember when “if AI could beat a grandmaster at chess” was considered the finish line.
- sanex 7mo agoOver fitting to the benchmarks since 1996
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- emp17344 7mo agoWell, yeah… turns out that goal wasn’t a good indicator for AGI, so we re-evaluated. That’s changing your hypothesis in the face of evidence, not “moving the goalposts” in the fallacious sense.
- Mistletoe 7mo agoWhat’s the indicator for AGI now? We are so far past the Turing Test it isn’t funny. In fact the models now are too intelligent, you would never think a human would have that much knowledge quickly about a subject you chose at random.
- lowbloodsugar 7mo agoRobocop was a human brain in a suit! Don't give them any ideas!
- scottyah 7mo agoIn what way do we not already have AGI?
- airstrike 7mo agoin all of them
- Der_Einzige 7mo agoPeter norvig is smarter than you are: https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-already-here/ https://www.noemamag.com/artificial-general-intelligence-is-...
- omcnoe 7mo agoDoes non-artificial intelligence have clean instruction/data separation?