3 ms·
So what's the solution? Not using AI?
by uxcolumbo 6mo ago
So what's the solution? Not using AI?
- bigfishrunning 6mo agoExactly this. You don't need it. Nobody does.
- uxcolumbo 6mo agoYeah not a realistic scenario. AI is immensely useful and if applied correctly will help humanity. The question is how do you reign in the robber barons, who just want to use AI to maintain their status quo and extract more and more profit from the system.
- bigfishrunning 6mo ago> AI is immensely useful Right up until you need to do something you can't plagiarize > if applied correctly will help humanity. It isn't and won't be. Its entire purpose is to plagiarize artists, writers, and programmers, and to slowly whittle away those professions as viable. When there are no engineers left, we'll go back to sticks and stones I guess.
- Jtarii 6mo agoAI output is obviously transformative and would be protected by fair use. The argument is about whether the training data was stolen. (which it was)
- Levitz 6mo agoThen what's the problem? Nobody needs it, nobody will use it, it will just die off.
- heddycrow 6mo agoSupport continued development of AI in the open. Support use of local or small scale AI. Your usage, support, and attention matters.
- 7tflutter7 6mo agoOpen source AI is even worse for copyright infringement lol. They have 0 filters.
- heddycrow 6mo agoBetter the enemy you know than the one you do not. That false? And how is it we know as much about closed models as we do about the open ones?