3 ms·
> except you get shafted That's the point, isn't it? Creating images via AI offers nothing to society. Its only purpose is making money, and ethics are only a
by tgv 6mo ago
> except you get shafted
That's the point, isn't it? Creating images via AI offers nothing to society. Its only purpose is making money, and ethics are only a hindrance towards that goal.
- kolinko 6mo agoI did a lot of AI images to show my friends and enjoy. There was definitely a benefit to society. And my friends used AI as a replacement of stock photos and graphics in their products which offer a ton to society.
- tgv 6mo ago> There was definitely a benefit to society. Because otherwise they would have gone out to the street and mugged old ladies? > And my friends used AI as a replacement of stock photos and graphics in their products which offer a ton to society. Yeah, that's the negative contribution. They're basically ripping off artists and designers. If those products offer a ton, some of that money could have gone towards them instead of OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.
- 7tflutter7 6mo ago'I dislike AI, therefore it has no value to anyone.' Who knew the international unit of truth was your feelings?
- Jtarii 6mo agoGenerative art has negative value, saying it has no value is far too generous. It actively makes the world a worse place.
- 7tflutter7 6mo agoThere is a 100% chance you will consume games / movies / media that was at least in part generated by AI, and enjoy it. The idea that 50 years from you will still be holding out is hilarious.
- tgv 6mo agoYou're making assumptions, and try to frame those as childish. I dislike the current AI offerings because of their inherent negative contributions to society. "I'm addicted to/invested heavily in AI, so any criticism is flawed."