3 ms·

Except you're hearing it from someone who doesn't have a problem handling state machines and epoll and manual thread management.

• palata 6mo ago
  And that was intuitive and easy to learn?
  • nottorp 6mo ago
    I find state machines plus some form of message passing more intuitive than callbacks or any abstraction that is based on callbacks. Maybe I'm just weird.
    • palata 6mo ago
      When I did not know how to program, neither async nor message passing were intuitive. I had to learn, and now those are tools I can use when they make sense. I never thought "programming languages are a failure, because they are not intuitive to people who don't know how to program". My point being that I don't judge a tool by how intuitive it is to use when I don't know how to use it. I judge a tool by how useful it is when I know how to use it. Obviously factoring in the time it took to learn it (if it takes 10 years to master a hammer, probably it's not a good hammer), but if you're fine with programming, state machines and message passing, I doubt that it will take you weeks to understand how async works. Took me less than a few hours to start using them productively.
• dullcrisp 6mo ago
  Right but how do you expose your state machine and epoll logic to callers? As a blocking function? As a function that accepts continuations and runs on its own thread? Or with no interface such that anyone who wants to interoperate with you has to modify your state machine?