6 ms·
Meta employees are up in arms over a mandatory program to train AI on their
- raxxorraxor 6mo agoIf you work for meta you shouldn't have a problem with invading the privacy of others. Of course this is not ok, but you should really quit your job if you have ethical or moral problems with that.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- newshackr 6mo agoThere isn't exactly a surplus of jobs today. While some may have this option, many do not.
- spacechild1 6mo agoAt this point, Meta's opinion on privacy has been widely known for decades. Working for Meta is a personal choice. There is no excuse.
- physhster 6mo ago^ this! Ever since the Cambridge Analytica scandal, people who decide to work there make the statement that they are ok with it. Same with Palantir, X, Grok, Tesla etc
- spacechild1 6mo agoYes. It's worth pointing out that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was in 2016 - that's 10 years ago! At that point, FB resp. Zuckerberg already had a bad reputation.
- none2585 6mo agoEh - if you have Meta on your resume it's not that tough out there right now.
- Planktonne 6mo agoThat argument doesn't really fly for some of the most highly paid people in the world with at least one really big name on their CVs. Everyone working at Meta has more options than almost anyone else.
- hirako2000 6mo agoThat's a good point. The crux is privacy or half your salary.
- the_snooze 6mo agoExactly, these are highly-paid professionals with very broadly applicable skills. They have the means to uphold professional values.
- ForHackernews 6mo agoAnyone working for Meta could have chosen to work elsewhere. You have other options (that might not pay $350 grand, but hey, that's the price of your soul)
- glimshe 6mo agoPoor Meta employees. They are victims of the oppressive job market and are left no other option than to work for 100s of thousands of dollars per year in well-lit and comfortable offices with free food and premium healthcare.
- everdrive 6mo agoAnyone who could get a job at meta has other options, I think this is why people are so confident criticizing. Outside of the obvious (and correct!) hypocrisy angle, I think this would be an altogether different issue if it were for grocery store workers, retail employees, etc. (or for a much more real example, Amazon warehouse workers) Those groups really might not have other real options.
- razingeden 6mo agoBut I was only following orders!
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- fhennig 6mo agoOf course quitting can be in the cards, but I'd much rather see a successful pushback from meta employees against this new policy; maybe this could be a good cause to form a union over.
- NikolaosC 6mo agoExactly. Meta spent 15 years mining user data and now mines its own staff to build the agents that'll replace them. If you're still there complaining about privacy, you're not the victim rahter the training set
- Frieren 6mo ago> you should really quit your job Stop blaming the working class. We need jobs to pay our bills. Regulate capital, force them to follow the law, force them to be ethical, and use all the force of the state for doing so. To blame employees for the capital behavior is absurd and solves nothing. Put the high up decision makers in prison. Punish the real criminals and we will get back our privacy and our rights.
- ramon156 6mo agoStop using bills as an excuse to be on the wrong side of history. Were the nazi soldiers innocent for gassing jews? Or were they also just "following the law"? Being ethical is hard, but it's not an excuse. Yes, I judge people that work for FAANG, I judge colleagues for extensively rely on LLMs, and Big Corps for that matter. > Regulate capital How? Oh, right, by not using these products or working for the mentioned companies. It's so easy to shift blame on other's and mark it as "not my problem lol"
- Frieren 6mo ago> It's so easy to shift blame on other's and mark it as "not my problem lol" I don't say that it is "not my problem". It is. That is why Facebook is guilty and high level decision makers should be held accountable by the law. We need to make it happen. Until CEOs and the like are in prison we are failing society.
- michaelt 6mo agoSeveral reports say even a mid-ranked engineer at Meta can earn $200k in salary and another $100k in stock and bonus, every year. And that's not some rare, mega-senior E8 architect either. Is there any point where a person stops being working class? Can I be chauffeur-driven to the opera in my gold-plated Lamborghini and still call myself working class?
- tardedmeme 6mo ago[dead]
- 6mo ago
- andrewstuart 6mo agoThe company is run by lizards in hoodies.
- loloquwowndueo 6mo agoNow now don’t be mean to lizards
- shevy-java 6mo agoIt is in a way some kind of modern day slavery. Of course they can always decide to quit, but what if the next company uses the same sniffing strategy? On youtube you can see video clips of indians wearing various glasses to monitor their own manual work procedures. AI has truly become our new overlord, controlled by a few huge companies.
- nicman23 6mo agolol what. you are getting paying it is not slavery
- zelphirkalt 6mo agoSome people are forced to work in places, which are dehumanizing through work conditions, whether you get paid for it or not doesn't necessarily tell you much. Of course this is not the case for Mete employees, who should have an easy time finding other employment. But these trends are not limited to Meta. They might find application in some shithole of a badly paid job somewhere, where people have only the choice between living poorly in some slums, or serving their local tech overlord.
- nicman23 6mo agoyea but not software developers lets be real
- micik 6mo agoBecause slaves were not getting paid? Not only were they getting paid, slavery in the Roman Empire involved a bidirectional responsibility. In times of economic hardship and downturn, the owner was required to look after the slave. No kicking to the curb allowed. Slaves were able to buy themselves out and the list of former slaves who became magnates and even politically influential at the highest level was indeed long and packed with names. Being a slave was not considered dishonorable or lowly and the power dynamic was not based on notions of inherent ethnic based superiority. Not that the Romans weren’t plenty racist — they were. They also knew what a category error is and were not wont to induce it in themselves. Perhaps they had standards where intellectual rigor is concerned. The ugly American version of slavery really did a number on people’s understanding of the institution. When we look at the current boardroom and C-suite “elites” and how they were often literally handed their business by the established power structures (Google and the CIA VC fund; DARPA and “lifelog” into Facebook etc), you can’t help but get the feeling that in our wage slavery society social mobility options are worse than Roman era slaves could avail themselves of. Keen study of history is the only thing that can halt the slide of citizenry into universal and absolute ignorance. Given that Joe Schmoe no longer reads anything longer than a reel caption and even Ignatius Intellectual often maxes out at a blog post, I’d say the slide is well and truly lubed up.
- keybored 6mo agoI don’t care about Schadenfreude. It’s good that they are making a stink. I would bang my head against the wall if they either didn’t make a stink or publicly said that, of course the Company is going to monitor me, it’s their hardware[1] and who am I to be anything but a vessel for my employer on Company time etc. [1] As seen in the comments on the large thread about this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851948 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851948
- zelphirkalt 6mo agoYou are (hopefully) a human being firstly, and only in some later capacity "a vessel for my employer on Company time". It would do the world some good, if more people remembered, that they are working with people and their decisions affect people.
- keybored 6mo agoI cannot understand how in normative terms someone ought to be merely a vessel for someone in any capacity, ever. There are things you cannot do to someone and certain things you as an individual cannot sign away. That’s what “human rights” and similar frameworks are supposed to be about anyway.
- thedevilslawyer 6mo ago[flagged]
- keybored 6mo agoSpeaking about Meta employees. There was this anecdote from a month ago: > very few facebook employees use their products outside of testing, which is a big contributor to that fear - they just can't believe that there are billions of people who would continue to use apps to post what they had for lunch! > And as a result of that lack of faith, most of them believe that Meta is a bubble and can burst at any point. Consequently, everyone works for the next performance review cycle, and most are just in rush to capture as much money as they could before that bubble bursts. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409649 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47409649
- vortegne 6mo agoSmall-scale imperial boomerang. You thought that you're building a privacy-destroying machine and this machine will never destroy _your_ privacy? At some point in the future, a lot of the SV techbros will be hopefully viewed as ghouls with no morals or ethics. This is not a subsection of humanity that should be dictating anything and yet they always do. If you complain about this and don't quit your job at Meta, you're failing an extremely basic check.
- gamerslexus 6mo ago> This is not a subsection of humanity that should be dictating anything and yet they always do. Interesting phrasing. So which subsection of humanity you think should be dictating something? Is there a reason you didn't go with > No subsection of humanity should be dictating anything and yet these techbros always do.
- rootlocus 6mo agoWith all due respect to the guidelines that requires assuming good faith, this sounds like the beginning of a nirvana fallacy. You don't have to provide a perfect solution to point out something is wrong. People who don't care about the people they lead don't make good leaders. I'd rather have leaders who hurt others by accident than on purpose.
- ceejayoz 6mo ago> So which subsection of humanity you think should be dictating something? "Here's your shit sandwich." "I don't want a shit sandwich!" I don't have to know what I do want to eat to decline the shit sandwich.
- gamerslexus 6mo agoThe shit sandwich is the sneaky idea that any "subsection of humanity" should dictate anything. Weirdly it's always a subsection that the speaker happens to be in or be friends with. I don't know about you but I know I don't want that shit sandwich.
- notabotiswear 6mo ago>"This makes me super uncomfortable. How do we opt out?" Karma’s a b*tch, innit?
- thedevilslawyer 6mo agoA better reply would have been: > "This makes me super uncomfortable. How do we opt out?" >> Opt-out is as simple as sending in your resignation to your manager.
- dist-epoch 6mo agoTypical Meta employee: > I can't hear you over the sound of the millions I'm making at Meta.
- codeulike 6mo agoIs this like a game where we choose the next word? Meta employees are up in arms over a mandatory program to train AI on their _______ Pets? Hairstyles?
- super256 6mo ago80 characters limit in the title.
- ceejayoz 6mo agoYeah, but usually folks tweak to paraphrase, instead of lopping off. I'd have gone with "Meta employees up in arms over mandatory program to train AI on their keystrokes".
- xnorswap 6mo agoYou can squeeze it into half that length with, "Meta staff fury at Big Brother AI scheme"
- brightbeige 6mo ago"Meta staff angry at AI"
- brycewray 6mo ago"Sticks nix hick pix" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticks_Nix_Hick_Pix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticks_Nix_Hick_Pix
- codeulike 6mo agoZuck Sucks Hack Clicks
- TacticalCoder 6mo agoI thought it was "arms"? Although I take it that then the sentence should have ended with "theirs" and not "their"?
- yubblegum 6mo agoOddly enough was watching Colossus: The Forbin Project. One of those mid 70s scifi flicks. At some point, their AI demanded that its creator be under 24/7 audio-visiual surveillance (including bathroom time, yes). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project p.s. was just reading the wiki plot summary and lol'ing at this bit: "Colossus has the responsible programmers summarily executed outside their workplace, left laying 24 hours, and cremated. Colossus also names their replacements. " -- karma is a bitch, indeed.
- RajT88 6mo agoTHAT IS TOO MUCH VERMOUTH
- yubblegum 6mo agolol, yes :)
- wolfie69 6mo agoThat's one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies. Alot of movies after that ripped off the plot of a massive supercomputer taking over humanity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t46Kjy-IJpY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t46Kjy-IJpY
- spacechild1 6mo agoNice. Let them taste some of their own medicine.
- pluc 6mo agoSo they do treat their employees like their users
- throw0101a 6mo agoNow over ten years old (2015-10-16): > 'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party. * https://twitter.com/Cavalorn/status/654934442549620736 https://twitter.com/Cavalorn/status/654934442549620736
- LightBug1 6mo agoThe most exquisite form of karma.
- ludicrousdispla 6mo ago> The post says the software is limited to a list of commonly used work applications, like Gmail, GChat, and Metamate, an AI assistant for employees. > It also says it only applies to computers, not to employees' phones. What a great motivator for employees to stop using their work computers.
- Mordisquitos 6mo agoWhat a relief that it only applies to when they're using their computers! At first I thought it applied to all work at their desks: paperwork, typing, phonecalls, etc. That would have been crazy. Does anyone know how many Meta employees use a computer, and what fraction of their work they do on it? It cannot be that much, surely.
- anygivnthursday 6mo agoThis is just v1, next release might add eye movement, pulse and brain wave tracking to train ZuckNet.
- yodsanklai 6mo agoPeople are always keen on criticizing the EU and their regulations, but employees in EU are protected from these kinds of stunts. And also from the upcoming (rumored) layoffs which won't be nearly as cruel.
- DoctorDabadedoo 6mo agoLayoffs in EU happen all the same, they are just sprinkled throughout the fiscal year to avoid legal disputes due to the number of people let go.
- w4yai 6mo ago> happen all the same No. They happen, but with a significant difference
- plufz 6mo agoObviously it happens but I think you’ll have a hard time arguing that worker rights are as bad in the EU as in the US. ITUC Global Rights Index (2025) Europe: 2.78 Nordics: 1.0–1.2 Western Europe: 2.0–2.3 Americas: 3.68 United States: 4 I couldn’t find per state US numbers but the difference is obviously huge.
- junon 6mo agoLayoffs don't happen the same way they do in the US, at least in Germany. It's expensive to lay someone off due to dual-party notice period requirements. "At will" is a foreign concept here.
- yodsanklai 6mo agoCorrect me if I'm wrong but for Meta/Google, past layoffs in France, Germany, Netherlands were done on a voluntary basis. It also took many months between the announcement and the actual layoff and the severance was competitive. One may argue that salaries are lower and there are less opportunities in tech in those countries - because of stronger regulation - but I think the layoffs procedures are objectively much more favorable for employees.
- chrisjj 6mo agoRequired reading: The Circle by Dave Eggers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Circle_(Eggers_novel) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Circle_(Eggers_novel)
- Havoc 6mo agoVery little sympathy frankly. Half the big tech world is economically built on mass scale invasive unwanted tracking & adtech. If it goes up in flames from internal tension about invasive tracking that's just karma
- spprashant 6mo agoThey are trying so hard to make AI do human jobs instead of focussing on opportunities where AI is special suited. Do you really want your super intelligent token muncher to be clicking browser tabs all day?
- moregrist 6mo agoI understand the schadenfreude people are feeling here. It certainly feels like a fitting outcome for people who work for a company with the morals of Meta. But I hope they successfully push back against it. I don’t want this kind of behavior normalized.
- sys_64738 6mo agoFacebook employees forced their algorithms on the public at large and now the company is doing the same. What did you think would happen when you are employed by an adware company?
- aldielshala 6mo agoEveryone's focused on Meta employees, but the real concern is normalization. If Meta does this and gets away with it, some companies may quietly roll out the same thing.
- nathanaldensr 6mo agoTaking money from the devil on one hand, protesting evil with the other. Make it make sense. "Rules for me but not for thee."
- josefritzishere 6mo agoThe irony is thick as peanut butter this morning.
- tempodox 6mo agoI’m getting vertigo from the level of hypocrisy.