3 ms·
That's literally any software subscription ever.
by estomagordo 6mo ago
That's literally any software subscription ever.
- inetknght 6mo agoSo you're perfectly okay with repeatedly paying for a shit product, getting shat on by the company in the form of being tested for feedback, and "maybe" getting a better product in the future. Mind you, that "better" isn't necessarily better for you but more explicitly better for the company you're paying. Sounds like someone who doesn't care about being a sheep. Or maybe someone whose salary depends on having sheep.
- nocman 6mo agoI think you are making far too wide-sweeping statements. I think most people here probably agree that if Anthropic drops Claude Code from the Pro plan after people have paid with the understanding that it is part of the package, that would be wrong, and they deserve to lose business over it. However, there are plenty of situations where A/B testing is entirely benign, and I would not have any problem with a company doing that testing without getting consent first. Every form of A/B testing is not done just for the gain of the company doing the testing.
- estomagordo 6mo agoI am not getting shat on by them working to improve the product. Have you got a screw loose?
- throw-the-towel 6mo agoWell, duh, that's precisely what's wrong with subscriptions.
- estomagordo 6mo agoThat the product might improve?
- throw-the-towel 6mo agoIn my experience, improvements are so rare compared to regressions, they might as well not exist.