3 ms·

But the OSS license already absolves them of responsibility. This might just be to set the tone that security fixes won't be prioritized to the standard that th

by Reubend 6mo ago

But the OSS license already absolves them of responsibility. This might just be to set the tone that security fixes won't be prioritized to the standard that they used to be.

cortesoft 6mo ago
You seem really confident that an OSS license would protect them from liability… what is that confidence based on?
- Reubend 6mo ago
  It's a straightforward MIT license: https://github.com/calcom/cal.diy/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/calcom/cal.diy/blob/main/LICENSE > IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
  - liamgm 6mo ago
    This is good , switching from viral license to more corporate friendly licensig
  - cortesoft 6mo ago
    Just because a license says you are not liable for anything doesn't mean a court will always uphold that.
    - nextaccountic 6mo ago
      if the license can't shield them, do you think that a blog post might?