3 ms·
One of the main criteria to differentiate "rants" from "correcting falsehoods" is proper citing of sources. In the case of Grapheneos, unfortunately I often see
by fph 6mo ago
One of the main criteria to differentiate "rants" from "correcting falsehoods" is proper citing of sources. In the case of Grapheneos, unfortunately I often see very few sources in what they post online.
(But, if you ignore the rants, that's a fantastic OS.)
- HybridStatAnim8 6mo agoGrapheneOS has plenty of evidence and they post it alongside their claims. They post it carefully though, and are willing to provide it to people upon request.
- fph 6mo agoHow far down do you have to scroll on https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS to find a citation to a source for one of their claims?
- HybridStatAnim8 6mo agoAt the time of writing, I scrolled 4 posts down and found one. GrapheneOS are security researchers, so they often are a first party source. As for the attacks, they have plenty of evidence for their claims. They avoid giving any attacks more publicity, but they usually provide evidence if you ask.
- fph 6mo agoPlease provide a link to this post you found, so I can tell which one you think is a citation to a source. If you want some examples of recent posts that should have a source but don't, here they are: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442796907613215 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442796907613215 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442754144530576 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116442754144530576 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439834987996043 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439834987996043 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439798112845463 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439798112845463 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439747793648606 https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116439747793648606 (the linked post in Mastodon is the one displayed with a bigger font, not necessarily the first at the top of the page.)