3 ms·
the irritating thing about LLM generated papers like these is that they're wrong but are generated using LLMs that are capable enough to bury the absurd claim p
by gaze 5mo ago
the irritating thing about LLM generated papers like these is that they're wrong but are generated using LLMs that are capable enough to bury the absurd claim pretty deep in there.
- stingraycharles 5mo agoAnalyze it using an LLM. Claude was pretty ruthless about this one.
- gaze 5mo agosure but it seems spiritually wrong to use an LLM to debug a slop paper. Who knows, maybe claude generated it in the first place?
- thethirdone 5mo agoYeah, for me Claude identified the phrase "this holds with probability 1 over random weight matrices since the null space has dimension" Treating trained weights as random for the purpose of a proof is immediately discrediting for a paper to me.
- EGreg 5mo ago"This holds for almost all matrices" is actually something you'd want to know if we're talking about probabilities, no?
- Hard_Space 5mo agoIn fairness, real-world researchers are expert at selective emphasis too.