4 ms·
The replier was wrong, though. They misread it and skipped over the part they thought wasn’t there.
by kstrauser 6mo ago
The replier was wrong, though. They misread it and skipped over the part they thought wasn’t there.
- calf 6mo agoThey they're both wrong for separate reasons, hah. Edit: the person who posted the links is still saying they're right, it seems they found the wrong link and fixed it.