3 ms·
"A significant number of jets it entered the war with" does not mean they haven't also gotten newer jets.
by BobbyJo 6mo ago
"A significant number of jets it entered the war with" does not mean they haven't also gotten newer jets.
- nickff 6mo agoFrom looking at the sources below, it looks like Ukraine still has about 1/3 of the fighter aircraft it started the war with, though it started with many non-serviceable units (seems that at least 20 aircraft were non-operational), and received many parts from abroad: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_warfare_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_warfare_in_the_Russo-Uk... https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/how-many-aircraft-losses-russia-ukraine/ https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/how-many-aircraft-losse... I am not sure what is meant by 'a significant number of', and I'm not sure if all commenters have a common definition of that phrase, so I'm unable to judge the veracity of the comments above.
- dmix 6mo agoPretty sure almost all of the functional ones were destroyed or were kept in such reserve for security they weren't being used.
- greedo 6mo agoThey're still flying SU-27 frequently, and those weren't replaced by donations.
- varjag 6mo agoNo there are still tens of original UAF jets that by now clocked thousands of sorties. Sometimes they get shot down or otherwise lost and we get photographic evidence (tail number, sometimes even pre-war colors) that it's one of the OGs.