4 ms·
The government is going to surveil. That's not going to change. It's whether or not warrantless searches are admissible; and they generally arent.
by incomingpain 6mo ago
The government is going to surveil. That's not going to change.
It's whether or not warrantless searches are admissible; and they generally arent.
- calmbonsai 6mo agoThere's also the issues of geo-fenced warrants and the FISA courts in the U.S. Warrant processes and issuance should not be secret nor generic enough to allow for "blanket" hoovering of Personally Identifiable Information.
- pizzly 6mo agoI tend to agree but fear that people will value 'safety' over personal freedom. If these acts prevent x crimes, allow people to walk the streets, etc then people will think 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear'. We as a society will have to accept more deaths and crimes by not implementing total surveillance. Its going to be hard to convince people of that if governments can demonstrate the benefits.
- downrightmike 6mo agoShow me where these have done any good at stopping crime. Seriously. The prism program director testified infront of congress that they didn't stop any attacks and wouldn't be able to because it was a needle in a hay stack