2 ms·
The claim is compelling. But the author's writing style–punctuated with needless character assasinations, e.g. the dig about not being a lumberjack, or hyperbol
by JumpCrisscross 7mo ago
The claim is compelling. But the author's writing style–punctuated with needless character assasinations, e.g. the dig about not being a lumberjack, or hyperbolic rhetorical questions–makes me wanting for a better source. (Author says, at the end, they have experience as a journalist, so I want to underline that I'm going off style alone right now.)
- quantified 7mo ago> The following newsletter has been rewritten using AI based on my original script for the video posted above—in the case of inconsistencies please defer to the video.
- dogleash 7mo ago> But the author's writing style–punctuated with needless character assasinations I dare say those are the point rather than an side property of writing about quacks' downfalls. The media serves non-zero inoculation effect against quacks, but their approach to coverage is much more self-indulgent than what anyone brainstorming a coverage approach to maximize their readers' heath literacy would create.