4 ms·
If money is no object, then nothing else is worth considering if it isn't Codex 5.4/Opus 4.7/SOTA. But for many to most people, value Vs. relative quality are h
by Someone1234 6mo ago
If money is no object, then nothing else is worth considering if it isn't Codex 5.4/Opus 4.7/SOTA. But for many to most people, value Vs. relative quality are huge levers.
Even many people on a Claude subscription aren't choosing or able to choose Opus 4.7 because of those cost/usage pressures. Often using Sonnet or an older opus, because of the value Vs. quality curve.
- wahnfrieden 6mo agoCodex subscription is very generous at pro tiers
- dd8601fn 6mo agoAlso us weirdos with local model uses. But your point stands.
- seplite 6mo agoUnfortunately, like with the release of Qwen3.6-Plus, this model also isn’t released for local use. From the linked article: “Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is the hosted proprietary model available via Alibaba Cloud Model Studio”
- CamperBob2 6mo agoCost may or may not be a factor in my choice of model, but knowing the capabilities and knowing they will remain consistent, reliable, and available over time is always a dominant consideration. Lately, Anthropic in particular has not been great at that.
- jpfromlondon 6mo agoanecdotally the quality of output isn't significantly different, the speed seems to be what you're really paying for, and since the alternative is free I'll stick to local.
- paprikanotfound 6mo agoWhat are the best models to run locally?
- jpfromlondon 6mo agoright now Gemma 4 and Qwen 3.6, I've found the latter to have the slight edge but your results may vary.
- elAhmo 6mo agoCodex 5.4 is not out?