> everything perceived to be somehow against American political party A can only be of interest for proponents of American political party B. This is a strange

> everything perceived to be somehow against American political party A can only be of interest for proponents of American political party B. This is a strange thing to say about someone pointing out that the problem is widespread. It's not a false dichotomy: insider trading is endemic to congress. Also why would you write "false dichotomy that everything perceived to be somehow against American political party A can only be of interest for proponents of American political party B" when someone is replying to the most unhinged and extreme take: > > That line of argument... is often associated with pro-Kremlin narratives If you want to talk about a false dichotomy, maybe someone engaging in ridiculous conspiracy theories about how criticising Democrats can only be of interest for proponents of the Russian regime would be a good place to start?