4 ms·
I can still see a path where the manager was stupid but not malicious. The manager sent on a document which he was too lazy to check at least had the right endp
by harvey9 6mo ago
I can still see a path where the manager was stupid but not malicious. The manager sent on a document which he was too lazy to check at least had the right endpoints but left the GP's contact details on.
I could also imagine intentional harm to GP's reputation was the goal, with really clumsy execution.
- antisthenes 6mo agoEither way, that person should not be managing anything. And if it was an honest mistake, they need to come out and apologize both to the IC and to the team that is using the documentation.
- plumbees 6mo agoMany mangers shouldn't be managing anything.
- slava_ 6mo agoI think it says a lot about micromanaging practice broadly. the person assigned for a task should be fully trusted and accountable. the manager could've criticize writing, recommend using LLM, but not interfere. what they've done shows lack of trust and responsibility first.