3 ms·
It is said that governments should legislate for results, not actions. This is a very clear example why.
by yen223 14y ago
It is said that governments should legislate for results, not actions. This is a very clear example why.
- a-priori 14y agoLaws like this should use wording like the Frye Standard for expert testimony, which says that scientific principles must be 'generally accepted' by the scientific community to be admissible in court. Likewise, a law mandating cryptography should say that banks, and other organizations that deal in sensitive data, must use cryptography algorithms and practices that are 'generally accepted' by cryptographers as being secure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard