3 ms·
Good for those who made the money. I would have done so had I had such insider info, as long as it didn't compromise any operation.
by hereme888 6mo ago
Good for those who made the money. I would have done so had I had such insider info, as long as it didn't compromise any operation.
- egonschiele 6mo agoDo you not think that that would have a negative impact on the world? or do you not care, or is this "the world is going to hell so I may as well get mine"?
- hereme888 6mo agoIt's an unregulated world of gambling. Like trading DogeCoin. If you had insider knowledge, it was/is legal to trade there as you want.
- egonschiele 6mo agoAh okay, so it's a case of "it's legal so it's fine", and impact or principles don't come into it.
- hereme888 6mo agoUm, yes. If I were certain of a price movement before others, I'd take advantage, and so would you. But you can virtue signal with fake empathy if you'd like.
- low_tech_love 6mo agoAs long as the hordes of losers are not bothered by it enough to ask for fairness in the business, you’re right. Ethics and morals are constructs with the intention of creating a better, more just common existence. If the people in this common existence don’t care, then there is no reason for them not to do it.
- Bud 6mo ago[dead]