4 ms·
OP addresses that. Japan is not particularly dense, especially outside of core downtowns. You see the same dynamics in London and Paris. People do not "prefe
by cmatza 5mo ago
OP addresses that.
Japan is not particularly dense, especially outside of core downtowns.
You see the same dynamics in London and Paris.
People do not "prefer to live in dense urban environments" by urbanist standards.
They prefer to live in dense urban environments by North American standards, which can still be far less dense than urbanists really want.
- zhdc1 5mo ago> which can still be far less dense than urbanists really want. And this was my comparison?
- cmatza 5mo agoMay be an assumption on my part, but the language "people prefer to live in dense urban environment" is typical of urbanism-boosters - who definitely push a lot online that leads one to believe that anything less than inner Tokyo is unacceptable.
- zozbot234 5mo ago> People do not "prefer to live in dense urban environments" by urbanist standards. Nobody wants to live there, it's too crowded and there's too much demand for housing! Oh wait, that makes no sense.
- wallst07 5mo agoYES it does, JOBS! You are required to live there, its not a choice.
- zhdc1 5mo agoIt's a very US-centric perspective to assume that density = cities. Almost every town in the US, at one point, was dense enough to support a vibrant main street. Many (most?) of them even had tram lines and other forms of public transportation. It's not an either or proposition. You can have cost-effective infrastructure through relative density without having to deal with all of the trappings - good and bad - that come from a city.