3 ms·
The point is that ~£800,000/year is high, even possibly "very high" but it is not "most wealthy man in Britain" high, and certainly nowhere near "hire as many p
by bombcar 7mo ago
The point is that ~£800,000/year is high, even possibly "very high" but it is not "most wealthy man in Britain" high, and certainly nowhere near "hire as many people as worked for Darcy".
- cm2012 7mo agoIts more like making 800k per year today in India, where a lot of people make much less so you can have servants