2 ms·
What’s interesting here is that with AI, all our interfaces should evolve away from previous generation rigid forms / buttons / tables etc. towards something m
by psadri 6mo ago
What’s interesting here is that with AI, all our interfaces should evolve away from previous generation rigid forms / buttons / tables etc. towards something more fluid / dynamic / “natural”. Yet all the AI coding is geared towards producing more of the former.
- jayd16 6mo agoWhy would a remix engine move away from what it was trained on? Why would we want to move away from hard fought UX design lessons? Dynamic and fluid UX is infuriating.
- cmrx64 6mo agoi think of them as tiers of expertise— need to master the basics of structure and form before the robot has the learned representations to competently model user interactions with more fluid instantiations (by downprojecting into the overlearned fixed-semantics)
- xpct 6mo agoDo you have examples of "natural" UI that you like?
- apt-apt-apt-apt 6mo agoMind-reading brain implants. That's what he wants.
- cindyllm 6mo ago[dead]
- psadri 6mo agoMost of the software we interact with is at the end of the day some db tables, queries to read/write, and some ui to read/write. There have been so many times I wished I could just do my own db joins on the underlying db to get the views I wanted. But I can’t - because the app has pre-defined ui/query paths. With AI, I should be able to ask for things the product designers didn’t anticipate or left out and the system could query, create ui on the fly, etc…